omnia vs braintrust
Braintrust measures quality. Omnia makes quality the release gate.
In Omnia the pass threshold, the rollout and the live scores are one system, inside your cluster. Braintrust reports the score to CI; turning it into a release decision is a reporter you write.
A prompt change drops task completion from 94% to 81%.
on omnia
The suite carries its own pass threshold. 81% is below it, so the version stops at the gate. docs
on braintrust bt eval returns a non-zero exit code if any eval throws an exception. Failing on a score needs a custom reporter. their docs
The gate is the quality bar
At a glance
| Topic | Omnia | Braintrust, per its docs |
|---|---|---|
| Datasets and scorers | yes Scenarios, assertions and judges. docs enterprise | documented Datasets, scorers, playground. source |
| Quality gate in CI | yes Built in. docs | partly Custom reporter. source |
| Simulated users | yes Multi-turn, against real tools. docs | not documented Not documented. source |
| Voice testing | yes Built in. docs | partly Through a partner. source |
| Runs and rolls out agents | yes Yes. docs | not documented Not documented. source |
| Self-hosted | yes Every edition. docs | partly Enterprise, hybrid. source |
Common questions
- How is each priced?
- Braintrust charges by data processed and scores, with plans from free to Enterprise. Omnia is free while you build, the core is free in production, and the enterprise licencelicense is per environment per year from £30,000, with nothing metered.
Put your own agent through the gate.
Install Omnia in your cluster and run it free while you build.
Braintrust claims are from Braintrust’s published documentation, checked 22 October 2026. Spot something out of date? Tell us.