omnia vs lakera
Lakera spots prompt attacks. Omnia stops the tool call they’re after.
Omnia stops the attack where it does harm, at the tool call. Lakera, now part of Check Point, detects prompt injection, including in tool results, and leaves the decision to you.
A tool result carries a hidden instruction to export the customer list.
on omnia
Whatever the model now believes, the export tool’s policy only allows exports by named roles, to approved destinations. The call is refused before it runs and the audit says why. Adversarial callers tried the same trick before release. docs
on lakera Lakera returns a flagged result. You decide within your application what mitigating action to take. their docs
At a glance
| Topic | Omnia | Lakera, per its docs |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt injection detection | yes Adversarial tests before release. docs | documented Direct and indirect prompt attacks. source |
| Tool allow and deny lists | yes Per agent, plus a rule per call. docs enterprise | documented Tool allow and deny list. source |
| Blocking | yes Fails closed. docs enterprise | partly Your application acts on the flag. source |
| Redaction before the model | yes Tool responses, sessions, memory. how it works | partly Detection. source |
| Runs and releases the agent | yes Yes. docs | not documented Not in scope. source |
Common questions
- Who owns Lakera?
- Check Point acquired Lakera in 2025; Lakera Guard is now Check Point AI Guardrails.
Put your own agent through the gate.
Install Omnia in your cluster and run it free while you build.
Lakera claims are from Check Point’s published documentation, checked 22 October 2026. Spot something out of date? Tell us.