Somebody changed the refund prompt on Friday. Who finds out first?
On Omnia, a simulated customer does, before the new version takes any traffic. Lyzr and Omnia both build, test and run agents in your own cloud. Lyzr recommends an evaluation before you deploy; on Omnia the evaluation is the gate.
Before it ships, simulated customers run at it through the real tools: one disputing a charge, one who won’t take no, one talking over the agent on the phone. Three of them get refunds they shouldn’t, and the version stays at the gate. A subtler fault would get as far as the first step of the rollout before the metrics pulled it back. docs
on lyzr Lyzr’s docs recommend running an evaluation before you deploy. Outside its AWS AgentCore pipeline they describe no gate, no stepped rollout and no automatic rollback; you restore an earlier version yourself. their docs
A version has to earn production
A version that passes its scenarios moves into traffic in steps, and each step waits on the metrics. A customer halfway through a refund stays on the version they started with. docs enterprise
Lyzr: Every save is an immutable version you can restore. Evaluation is recommended before deploying; canary rollout isn’t documented. source
The evidence lands in your stack
Omnia installs into your Kubernetes cluster with Helm. Traces go out over OpenTelemetry to the collector you already run, metrics to Prometheus, and every session to Parquet you can query from Snowflake, BigQuery or DuckDB. docs
Lyzr: Traces use the OpenTelemetry format and appear in Lyzr’s own dashboard. Export to your own collector isn’t documented, and Kubernetes isn’t mentioned. source
Policy on the whole tool call
At a glance
| Topic | Omnia | Lyzr, per its docs |
|---|---|---|
| Runs in your cloud | yes Your Kubernetes cluster, or the same pack on AWS Bedrock AgentCore, Vertex Agents or Azure AI Foundry. docs | documented Your VPC, their SaaS, or hybrid. source |
| Simulated users | yes Multi-turn, against real tools, including adversarial callers. docs | partly Personas and scenarios; multi-turn when memory is on. source |
| Production failures become tests | yes A failed production session becomes a regression scenario that runs on every version after. docs enterprise | partly Live traces feed hardening suggestions. source |
| Voice testing | yes Barge-in, overlapping speech and dead air, recorded so you can listen back. docs | not documented Voice agents ship; testing them isn’t documented. source |
| Eval-gated release | yes The suite decides whether a version ships. docs | partly Recommended; a gate is described for the AWS AgentCore pipeline. source |
| Stepped rollout, auto rollback | yes Traffic shifts in steps and rolls back on its own. docs | not documented Not documented. source |
| Telemetry to your collector | yes OpenTelemetry and Prometheus, out of the box. docs | not documented Shown in Lyzr’s dashboard. source |
| Argument-level tool policy | yes A CEL rule on every call, before the tool runs. docs enterprise | not documented Not documented. source |
Common questions
- How is Lyzr priced compared with Omnia?
- Lyzr’s pricing page lists production from $100K a year, and its docs list per-run fees of $0.03 a single-agent run in your VPC, with tokens billed separately. Omnia is free while you build, the core is free in production, and the enterprise licencelicense is one price per environment per year from £30,000. Nothing is metered.
- Does Lyzr run in my own cloud?
- Yes, Lyzr documents a deployment inside your VPC. Omnia runs in your Kubernetes cluster and deploys the same pack to AWS Bedrock AgentCore, Vertex Agents or Azure AI Foundry.
- Can Omnia test an agent that’s already running somewhere else?
- Yes. Point its scenarios at any endpoint you can reach and run them, wherever the agent is hosted.
Put your own agent through the gate.
Install Omnia in your cluster and run it free while you build.
Lyzr claims are from Lyzr’s published documentation, checked 22 October 2026. Spot something out of date? Tell us.